Black's Law Dictionary defines judicial activism as a "philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy, among other factors, to guide their decisions. What is the significance of judicial activism in the United States?
What are examples of judicial activism in U. Hence, these are the vital decisions that have conceptualized judicial activism which were enunciated by the judges in order to bring about social change.
It is not pejorativeand studies suggest that it does not have a consistent political valence.
Is judicial activism the opposite of judicial restraint? By invalidating a New York law and interfering with the legislature, the Court favored an activist approach.
Also, the judges that are appointed are usually appointed by previously elected executive officials so that their philosophy should reflect that of those who nominated them, that an independent judiciary is a great asset to civil society since special interests are unable to dictate their version of constitutional interpretation with threat of stopping political donations.
The rationale for this can be stated that wide jurisdiction should not become a source of abuse of process of law by disgruntled litigant.
In the case of Bajaj Hindustan Ltd.