An overview of the formation of the biblical canon
The word canon primarily refers to a fixed standard or collection of Scriptures that defines the faith and identity of a particular religious community. I miss two articles on the idea of the cessation of prophecy : B.
As McDonald explains xxxii his interest in studying the formation of the biblical canon was born during his ministry in the early eighties, while trying to answer some questions on the subject from the laity of the First Bap- tist Church of Fremont, Nebraska.
I would add an old but important article : W.
It goes without saying that his work is must-reading for anyone who is interested in the question of canon. In other words, church councils did not create biblical canons, but rather reflected the state of affairs in such matters.
On the third edition, the book has been updated, becoming considerably longer, and the contents have been rewritten almost completely xv.
All of the expected English literature is included, with few excep- tions. But if it is true that a canon of books depends on the community which uses it, then a deep study on biblical canon should pay more attention to what a community is and to how it recognizes its canon.
Which council decided the books of the bible
Add to Cart Overview Lee Martin McDonald provides a magisterial overview of the development of the biblical canon—the emergence of the list of individual texts that constitutes the Christian bible. The notion of Scripture. Table of books[ edit ]. As McDonald explains xxxii his interest in studying the formation of the biblical canon was born during his ministry in the early eighties, while trying to answer some questions on the subject from the laity of the First Bap- tist Church of Fremont, Nebraska. McDonald, J. Rather the response of the second-century church was to produce a canon of faith regula fidei , but not a canon of sacred books. And even if there is some agreement, this does not neces- sarily mean that a biblical canon of twenty-two or twenty-four books was universally adopted by all Jews either in Palestine or in the Dispersion. In a footnote p. Kamesar, Biblical Interpretation in Philo, in Idem ed. I would go further and suggest that a concept of inspiration similar to the Christian one has no parallel in an- cient Jewish writers. So Christians of twenty-first century should feel free to consider possible changes to the biblical canon : Although I have questioned the viability of certain works like Ecclesiastes, Esther, Job, Song of Songs, 2 Peter, and other in our biblical canon, I am not doing anything here that was not done in the early church and in Judaism, as I will show. Lee McDonald has devoted much of his distinguished career to the question of the canon of the Old and the New testaments. Scrip- 1 On this point, McDonald follows W. This model is clearly used by apocalyptic literature, as 1 Enoch. The curriculum vitae of Prof.
based on 92 review